AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

WOODLAND SHORES. INC., Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Appellant.

In an action to annul assessments, taxes and tax lien certificates, relating to real property situated in the Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, judgments in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and defendant's motion for judgment dismissing the complaint granted, with costs. Findings and conclusions reversed. The assessment rolls described the property sufficiently for identification purposes, according to sections 21 Tax and 55-a Tax of the Tax Law. The description consists of marks surrounding the parcel. The omission of one or more incidental marks, such as the Dressen and Baker parcels, does not mean that such parcels are to be deemed included within the parcel described. The precise quantum of the realty set forth in the description rebuts such meaning. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOODLAND SHORES, INC. v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
(May 7, 1945)