KOEPPEL v. IRVINGTON WINDOW CLEANING CO., INC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, David Roskein and John A. Laird. For the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt and G. Dixon Speakman.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, David Roskein and John A. Laird. For the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt and G. Dixon Speakman.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BERNARD KOEPPEL, APPELLANT, v. IRVINGTON WINDOW CLEANING CO., INC., ET AL.,RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine, ubi supra. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

KOEPPEL v. IRVINGTON WINDOW CLEANING CO., INC

BERNARD KOEPPEL, APPELLANT, v. IRVINGTON WINDOW CLEANING CO., INC., ET AL.,RESPONDENTS.

Comments