1. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN — Inheritance — Right to Share in Estate of Father's Sister Denied. — An illegitimate child acknowledged by its father cannot inherit a share of the estate of the father's sister who survived the father. p. 562.
2. COURTS — Opinions — Stare Decisis — Illustrations — Inheritance by Illegitimate Child. — Since the rule that an illegitimate child acknowledged by its father cannot inherit a share of the estate of the father's sister who survived the father is supported by previous decisions, it has become a rule of property under the doctrine of stare decisis. p. 562.
3. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Distribution of Governmental Powers and Functions — Legislative — Duty Concerning Inheritance by Illegitimates. — If the statutes of descent as construed by the courts are too harsh in the light of modern opinion concerning the rights of illegitimates the remedy is with the legislature, and not the courts. p. 562.
RICHMAN, C.J.
This appeal presents a single question: May appellant, an illegitimate son, acknowledged by his father, inherit a share of the estate of the father's sister who survived the 1-3. father? It was decided against appellant's claim in Wilson v. Bass (1919), 70 Ind. App. 116, 118 N.E. 379 (Transfer denied), and Hall v. Fivecoat (1942), 110 Ind. App. 704, 38 N.E.2d 905. These decisions are supported by the reasoning in Jackson v. Hocke (1908), 171 Ind. 371, 84 N.E. 830 and Truelove v. Truelove (1909), 172 Ind. 441, 86 N.E. 1018. We are satisfied with the conclusion reached in the two Appellate Court cases. It has become a rule of property under the doctrine of stare decisis. Harrow v. Myers (1868), 29 Ind. 469; Dailey v. Pugh (1921), 83 Ind. App. 431, 131 N.E. 836; Stewart v. Wells (1911), 47 Ind. App. 228, 94 N.E. 235. If the statutes of descent so construed are too harsh in the light of modern opinion concerning the rights of illegitimates the remedy is with the legislature.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 62 N.E.2d 860.