Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W. W. ELLIOTT v. THE STATE.

Bills of Exception.

Where no statement of facts is brought forward on appeal from judgment of conviction and bills of exception in record do not recite sufficient facts to enable Court of Criminal Appeals to appraise the bills in absence of evidence produced on trial, judgment must be affirmed.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find several bills of exception in the record, but none of them contains a recital of sufficient facts to enable the court to appraise the bills in the absence of the evidence produced upon the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ELLIOTT v. STATE
(Nov 7, 1945)