Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAMS v. UTILITIES ENGINEERING INSTITUTE

1. APPEAL — Briefs — Failure to Comply With Court Rule — No Question Presented. — Where appellant's brief does not attempt to comply with the court rule concerning preparation of briefs, and does not contain any of the essential matters required by such rule, nothing is presented to the reviewing court thereby.

FLANAGAN, C.J.

Nothing is presented by appellant's brief. It does not attempt to comply with Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court, and does not contain any of the essential matters required by that rule. Upon careful examination of it we are unable to discover what happened in the trial court or what appellant seeks to present here.

Judgment affirmed.

NOTE. — Reported in 64 N.E.2d 302.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. UTILITIES ENGINEERING INSTITUTE
(Jan 11, 1946)