Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LUCILLE KURTH STRONG, complainant-respondent, v. JAMES H. STRONG andSTRONGHOLD, INC., defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the argument of appellant and find the same to be without merit.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Jayne, and reported at 136 N.J. Eq. 361. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, OLIPHANT, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRONG v. STRONG
(Jan 31, 1946)