Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE v. R. S. PRESNELL.

Criminal Law § 75 —

When a case is not docketed within the time prescribed, Rule 5, and no application for writ of certiorari is made, the appeal will be dismissed, the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court being mandatory and not directory.

The defendant, a citizen and resident of Caldwell County, was indicted in Buncombe County for selling butter in said county, which the warrant charged weighed less than represented, in violation of G.S., 81-17. The defendant interposed a plea in abatement on the ground that if the statute had been violated the offense occurred in Caldwell and not in Buncombe County. The plea was denied. Defendant appeals, assigning error.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was due to be heard at the call of the Nineteenth District, on 4 September, 1945. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546. Counsel cannot waive this rule. The rules of this Court are mandatory, and not directory. S. v. Moore, 210 N.C. 459, 187 S.E. 586.

The rules of practice governing the time for docketing appeals in the Supreme Court, or for applying for a writ of certiorari, where the case on appeal, for some cogent reason cannot be docketed within the time prescribed by the rules, has been uniformly enforced since the decision in S. v. Farmer, 188 N.C. 243, 124 S.E. 562. See also Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. PRESNELL
(Feb 1, 1946)