Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Edward S. Gillespie, Appellee, v. E

DIVORCE, § 77.1 — when annulment decree finding defendant insane was not contrary to manifest weight of evidence. Where appeal was taken from annulment decree issued pursuant to findings that defendant was insane on day of marriage to plaintiff, and it appeared that several lay witnesses testified to such insanity based upon their observations and conversations with defendant, both prior to and subsequent to marriage, and two psychiatrists testified that in their opinion, based upon proper hypothetical questions, defendant was insane, held that decree was not contrary to manifest weight of evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 11, 1946; rehearing denied May 15, 1946; released for publication May 16, 1946.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GILLESPIE v. GILLESPIE
(Apr 11, 1946)