McCANN v. STATE

(Syllabus.)

1. Intoxicating Liquors — Information for Unlawful Possession Held Sufficient. Where one is charged with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, etc., in the county where the crime is charged it is not necessary to allege in the information the exact place in the county where the intoxicating liquor is located, nor to allege the time of day or night when the defendant had possession of said intoxicating liquor.

2. Indictment and Information — Proper Mode of Attacking Sufficiency of Information. The proper mode of attacking the sufficiency of an information is by the filing of a demurrer, or motion to quash the same.

BAREFOOT, J.

Defendant, Virgil McCann, was charged in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county with the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in Oklahoma county, to wit: Ten pints of tax-paid liquor. He was permitted to withdraw a plea of not guilty, previously entered, and to enter a plea of guilty. He was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and costs taxed at $24.65, and to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail of Oklahoma county. From this judgment and sentence he has appealed.

This is a companion case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, and the same assignment of error is presented in this case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, the judgment of the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.