Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SAMUEL COYNE, Landlord, Appellant, v. MARTIN SILVERS et al., Tenants, Respondents, and SAUL MODELL et al., Undertenants, Respondents.

MEMORANDUM

Per Curiam.

The fact that the landlord desires to engage in a business similar to that conducted by the tenant does not deprive him of his right to secure possession of the premises where, as in the instant case, he establishes his good faith in seeking such possession for his immediate and personal use.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs

EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam;

HAMMER, J., dissents in the following memorandum:

I dissent and vote for affirmance. Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COYNE v. SILVERS
(May 28, 1946)