Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Joseph P. Rogers and La Verne Rogers, Appellants, v. Gene

REPLEVIN, § 86 — when correction of replevin order to provide for return of property to defendant was proper. In replevin action to recover possession of household furniture, where order was entered vacating order entered four days previously, finding that right to possession of property replevied was not in plaintiff, and ordering that writ of retorno habendo issue for return of property, which was omitted in prior order, held that order should have directed return of property to defendant in first instance and order subsequently entered correcting clerical mistake was proper (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 119, par. 22; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 109.522).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 29, 1946; released for publication July 2, 1946.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROGERS v. TRUDZINSKI
(May 29, 1946)