AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MAX BARASH et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of BARASH SIKORSKI, Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The right to a preference in a contract action accorded to a resident of Kings County may only be considered in respect of an action begun in the first instance as a matter of right in Kings County, and may not be considered when begun in disregard of section 182-b of the Civil Practice Act. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARASH v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(May 20, 1946)