AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

Columbia Construction Co., Inc., and others appealed a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in a dispute involving the construction of a lease clause. [1][2]

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the District Court correctly construed the disputed clause in the lease. [2]

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
66 F. Supp. 629 Construction of the lease clause at issue. The Court of Appeals agreed that the District Court had construed the clause correctly. [2]

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court stated that the appeal turned on the construction of a lease clause. It reviewed the District Court's construction and concluded that it was correct; the opinion provides no further analysis of the clause's language or application. [2]

Holding and Implications

The judgment was affirmed. [2] The decision left the District Court's judgment in effect. The opinion discusses no broader implications or new precedent.

COLUMBIA CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., a Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Da

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case turns on the construction of a clause in a lease. We think the District Court, 66 F. Supp. 629, construed the clause correctly. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COLUMBIA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. SACKETT
(Jun 17, 1946)