Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Margaret Panella, Appellee, v. Weil-McLain Company and Phillip Domke, Appellants.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 118 — when defendants' contention that there was no proof of their negligence was without merit. In action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when struck by defendants' truck after alighting from street car and while crossing street, where defendants contended that there was no proof as to their negligence, and it appeared that driver of truck testified that he was familiar with intersection, that after making right-hand turn onto street in question, he proceeded eastward at accelerated speed which was increased until time of accident, that he did not sound his horn at any time and that he knew that people alighted from street cars at that point and crossed street there, held that such contention was without merit.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE, SCANLAN.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 28, 1946; rehearing denied July 11, 1946; released for publication July 13, 1946.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PANELLA v. WEIL-McLAIN CO
(Jun 28, 1946)