AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of LUTHER E. COOK, Respondent, against NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. FULD, J., dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not "payment * * * of compensation previously awarded" within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: DYE, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF COOK v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
(Jul 23, 1946)