Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CATHERINE REDDICK, alias CATHERINE THOMAS v. THE STATE.

1. — Evidence.

2. — Aggravated Assault — Evidence.

Evidence sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Evidence sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon an indictment charging an assault with intent to murder with malice, appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.00.

The record is before this court without any bills of exception. No complaints were made of the court's charge, and no special charges were requested by appellant. Therefore, the only question presented for our consideration is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Without setting out the facts in detail, we deem them sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REDDICK v. STATE
(Oct 30, 1946)