AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATHERINE E. MEAGHER, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The plaintiff was not required to call experts as to her future condition. If the jury believed the plaintiff would be unable to teach in the future, they could not refuse to act in that belief. ( Record v. Village of Saratoga Springs, 46 Hun 448, 451, affd. 120 N.Y. 646; Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, 285 N.Y. 389, 396; Shaw v. Tague, 257 N.Y. 193, 195.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of plaintiff's having been negligently struck by one of defendant's busses. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEAGHER v. INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
(Jan 8, 1947)