Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE UNIFICATION OF BAR OF THIS COURT.

1. Attorney and client — Bar integration denied. A petition for integration or unification of the state Supreme Court bar was denied.

Per Curiam.

The petition for the organization of the bar of this state by court rule was orally argued by counsel favoring the application and by others in opposition thereto.

After duly considering the petition, some members of this court entertain the opinion that the integration or unification of the attorneys at law of the state into a compulsory, all-inclusive organization must come through legislative and not through judicial action, while other members hold to the view that, assuming authority in this court to provide for integration or unification of the bar, the existing situation does not require or justify the creation of a compulsory and all-inclusive association as petitioned for.

The petition is accordingly denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNIFICATION OF BAR OF THIS COURT
(Jan 4, 1947)