PHILLIPS v. EAST PATERSON | N.J. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

AMICUS AI

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellants, R. Sery Nicosia
Dominick F.
For the respondents, Winne Banta
John A.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellants, R. Sery Nicosia
Dominick F.
For the respondents, Winne Banta
John A.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

G. WILLARD PHILLIPS ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF EAST PATERSON ET AL.,APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, DONGES, HEHER, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, JJ. 11.

For reversal — PERSKIE, COLIE, McGEEHAN, JJ. 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments