Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Charles G. Ditis, Appellee, v. Ahl

APPEAL AND ERROR, § 98 — orders enlarging scope of and refusing to dissolve temporary injunction, after entry of decree directing accounting, as appealable interlocutory orders. Temporary injunction preserving status quo until final determination of rights of parties did not become functus officio upon entry of decree, after trial, fixing rights of parties and directing an accounting, since final rights of parties could not be determined until final accounting, and therefore subsequent orders enlarging scope of, and refusing to dissolve, that injunction were appealable to Appellate Court as interlocutory orders under section 78 of Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 110, par. 202; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.078).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE NIEMEYER.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 21, 1947; released for publication May 5, 1947.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DITIS v. AHLVIN CONST. CO., INC
(Apr 21, 1947)