Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH DI MARIA, APPELLANT, v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DI MARIA v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
(Apr 24, 1947)