Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Harold U. Roeth and Nadine K. Roeth, Appellees, v. Fritz F. Boehm and Erna I. Boehm, Appellants.

VENDORS AND PURCHASERS, § 21 — merchantable title as affected by existence of outstanding mortgage. Existence of unpaid mortgage affording vendors privilege of prepayment in full at any time did not render vendors' title unmerchantable as matter of law within meaning of contract for sale of realty entitling vendees to rescind contract and have deposit refunded if title report showed that vendors did not have merchantable title, where contract granted vendors right to remove objections to title at time of closing deal, even though contract was silent as to existence of mortgage, so that triable issue of fact whether title was merchantable arose upon vendors' counter-affidavits showing that they had made arrangement with holder of mortgage to pay and have it released at or prior to time of closing deal, which trial court could not determine on vendees' motion for summary judgment for amount of deposit.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 20, 1947; released for publication June 9, 1947.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROETH v. BOEHM
(May 20, 1947)