FLEMING v. BROWN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9269.

Attorney(S)

David London, of Washington, D.C. (William E. Remy, of Washington, D.C., Kenneth V. Fisher, of New York City, Samuel Mermin, and Stanley B. Frosh, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Atwood Cranston, of Jersey City, N.J., and Jacob S. Spiro, of New York City, for appellees.

Judges

John Biggs
Herbert Funk Goodrich
John Joseph O'Connell

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9269.

Attorney(S)

David London, of Washington, D.C. (William E. Remy, of Washington, D.C., Kenneth V. Fisher, of New York City, Samuel Mermin, and Stanley B. Frosh, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Atwood Cranston, of Jersey City, N.J., and Jacob S. Spiro, of New York City, for appellees.

Judges

John Biggs
Herbert Funk Goodrich
John Joseph O'Connell

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FLEMING, Temporary Controls Administrator, v. BROWN et al.

PER CURIAM.

The contention that the appeal at bar is moot cannot be supported in view of the allegations contained in the affidavits filed by the parties.

Every question presented by the appeal at bar must be decided in favor of the appellant by reason of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking and Lumber Co. and Raley v. Fleming, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 1129. The appellee's motion filed in this court to abate or to dismiss the action will be denied. The order of the court below, appealed from, will be reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

FLEMING, Temporary Controls Administrator, v. BROWN et al.

Comments