AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HARRY ADLER, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Respondents.

As to the defendant Long Island Railroad Company, judgment affirmed, with costs. Concur: LEWIS, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. Dissent: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

As to the defendant Tully Di Napoli, Inc., judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. DYE, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the ground there is no common-law liability of this defendant under the authority of Moore v. Wills, Inc. ( 250 N.Y. 426) and Iacono v. Frank Frank Contracting Co. ( 259 N.Y. 377).

A majority of the court is of opinion that subdivision 7 of section 241 of the Labor Law has no application to either defendant in the circumstances of this case. A majority of the court is of opinion that there was evidence of common-law negligence proper to be submitted to the jury as against the defendant Tully Di Napoli, Inc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADLER v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY
(Jul 2, 1947)