THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL, c., CO. v. MURPHY, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the relators-respondents, Hannoch Lasser ( Herbert J. Hannoch
Morris Weinstein, of counsel). For the respondents-appellants, Thomas L. Parsonnet ( Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, RELATORS-RESPONDENTS, v. VINCENTJ. MURPHY, JOHN A. BRADY, MEYER C. ELLENSTEIN, JOHN B. KEENAN, RALPH A.VILLANI, AND CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

This case is controlled by our decision to-day in the case of Brown v. Murphy, 136 N.J.L. 183 .

The only distinction is that the city, in this case, pursuant to statutory authority ( R.S. 40:179-34), established and constructed a seaport and industrial terminal and the lands of the respondents were incorporated therein, and that the city was given the power to condemn by R.S. 40:179-34.

The judgment under appeal is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL, c., CO. v. MURPHY

THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, RELATORS-RESPONDENTS, v. VINCENTJ. MURPHY, JOHN A. BRADY, MEYER C. ELLENSTEIN, JOHN B. KEENAN, RALPH A.VILLANI, AND CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

Comments