AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHIGAN WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, v. Thomas MARTINO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard on the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that the order of December 3, 1946, herein appealed from is not a final decision subject to review under Section 128(a) of the Judicial Code, Section 225(a), Title 28 U.S.C.A.; it is ordered that the appeal herein be and is dismissed. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911; Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, 7 Cir., 130 F.2d 535, and cases therein cited.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MICHIGAN WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY v. MARTINO
(Oct 14, 1947)