Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY MYERS APPLEBY, complainant, v. STEWART H. APPLEBY, indi

The construction adopted by Chancery of the will in question was proper.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case questions the construction adopted in the Court of Chancery of a last will and testament.

After carefully considering the conclusions of the learned Vice-Chancellor and the arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that the construction adopted therein is in all respects proper and that the decree under appeal should be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

APPLEBY v. APPLEBY
(Sep 25, 1947)