Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Paul J. Sedgwick, of Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. David G. Bress, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Sammond. Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Sidney M. Goldstein, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Wilding.
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Elijah Barrett Prettyman
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Paul J. Sedgwick, of Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. David G. Bress, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Sammond. Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Sidney M. Goldstein, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Wilding.
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Elijah Barrett Prettyman
See more information ...
Smart Summary

FELTMAN et al. v. SAMMOND. SAME

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were defendants in a personal injury action, contend among other things that the charge to the jury was defective and that the $20,000 verdict was excessive. We find no error either in the charge or elsewhere. It is settled that we cannot review a trial court's decision to grant or deny a new trial on the ground that a verdict was excessive or inadequate. Washington Times Co. v. Bonner, 66 App. D.C. 280, 86 F.2d 836, 110 A.L.R. 393.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

FELTMAN v. SAMMOND
(Oct 20, 1947)