Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DORIS E. CARRICK v. THE TRADESMEN'S NATIONAL BANK OF NEW HAVEN, CONSERVATOR (ESTATE OF ELIZABETH FLEETWOOD) ET AL.

The plaintiff's liability for the support of her mother (§ 1717) and her obligation to reimburse the state or municipality for institutional care furnished to the mother (§ 250f) constitute her an "aggrieved person" entitled to take an appeal from the denial by the Probate Court of the mother's application for a finding of restoration to capacity after having been adjudged an incapable person.

MELLITZ, J.

The plaintiff's mother was adjudged an incapable person by the Probate Court for the district of New Haven and thereafter filed an application for a finding of restoration to capacity, which was denied. The plaintiff has taken an appeal from the decree and the defendant conservator pleads in abatement and to the jurisdiction on the ground that the plaintiff is not an aggrieved person entitled to appeal from the decree within the meaning of § 4990 of the General Statutes.

One who has a pecuniary interest which may be injuriously affected by the decree is an aggrieved person within the statute. Avery's Appeal, 117 Conn. 201, 202.

Under § 1717 of the General Statutes, the plaintiff is made liable for the support of her mother, and she is subject to criminal prosecution for a neglect or refusal to furnish such reasonable support as her mother may require. Cum. Sup. 1935 § 1702c. Under § 250f, sup. 1941, the plaintiff may be obligated to reimburse the state or municipality if it should develop that her mother receives institutional care from the state or a municipality. The plaintiff's liability under these statutes is such as to warrant a conclusion that she has a pecuniary interest which may be affected by the decree. Cf. Merrill v. Merrill, 134 Wis. 395.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARRICK v. TRADESMEN'S NATIONAL BANK
(Oct 3, 1947)