Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

William Krug et al., Appellees, v. Armour and Company et al., Appellants.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 112.1 — conflicting evidence as to lights on stalled vehicle. In action for personal injuries sustained by occupants of two automobiles as result of nighttime collision on highway, between the automobiles and rear end of defendant's truck which had been stopped on highway because of mechanical difficulties, where it appeared that one of the automobiles collided with rear of truck, and immediately thereafter another automobile crashed into rear of first automobile, it was function of jury, upon conflicting evidence, to determine whether stalled truck was without lights, and court on appeal would not be justified in holding that verdict in favor of plaintiffs was against manifest weight of evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 30, 1947; rehearing denied February 10, 1948; released for publication July 27, 1948

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRUG v. ARMOUR CO
(Dec 30, 1947)