Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the matter of the application of AUGUST GOTTSMANN and MARY GREB on behalfof JOSEPH GOTTSMANN, SR., for writ of habeas corpus.

The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. Reasonable cause, held, not shown here.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the Chancellor, upon the advice of Vice-Chancellor Stein, discharging an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying an application therefor.

Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that reasonable cause was not shown. The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, § 6.

The order under review is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE GOTTSMANN
(Jan 29, 1948)