AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Harry R. JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral arguments in the appeal at bar convince us that the court below did not commit reversible error in the admission or introduction of testimony or in its instructions to the jury. We conclude therefore that the judgment of the court below, 75 F. Supp. 855, must be affirmed. An order will be entered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY
(Jan 6, 1948)