Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

POLK, APPELLANT v. CITY OF MAPLE HEIGHTS, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Real property — Common-law dedication — Ordinances recited dedication of land for street purposes and acceptance — Land paved and used as street — Deed to dedicator never recorded — Dedication not shown by recorded plat — Subsequent sale of land at forfeited-land tax sale — Action by purchaser's quitclaim grantee against municipality for recovery of land — Judgment for municipality — Inviolability of private property — Due process — Section 19, Article 1, Constitution — Article V, Amendments, and Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, SOHNGEN and STEWART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POLK v. CITY OF MAPLE HEIGHTS
(Jan 14, 1948)