Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL CARUSO, APPELLANT, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., ETC.,RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARUSO v. JOHN HANCOCK, c., INSURANCE CO
(Jan 29, 1948)