DE MOTT HOMES AT SALEM, INC. v. MARGATE CITY, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Winne Banta ( Walter G. Winne, of counsel). For the respondents, Perskie Perskie ( Joseph B. Perskie, of counsel).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Winne Banta ( Walter G. Winne, of counsel). For the respondents, Perskie Perskie ( Joseph B. Perskie, of counsel).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

THE DE MOTT HOMES AT SALEM, INC., ETC., RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF MARGATE CITY,ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 10.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, JJ. 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.