Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Emil and Marjorie Ferro, Appellants, v. John P. Daros, Appellee.

JUDGMENTS, § 5.1 — summary judgment when question of fact presented. In action by plaintiff vendors to recover sum of money deposited by vendees in escrow with defendant real estate broker, where defendant filed counterclaim and motion for summary judgment for commission allegedly due, and plaintiff's affidavits in opposition presented question of fact as to right of broker to recover any commission, trial court was obliged under law to try such controverted issue, and could not allow summary judgment for portion of claimed commission.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE FEINBERG.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 16, 1948; released for publication March 2, 1948.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FERRO v. DAROS
(Feb 16, 1948)