Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Karen B. Kraegel, Appellee, v. John P. Daros, Edward N. Landry and D.C. Pennock, Trading as Enterprises Exchange, Appellants.

DISCONTINUANCE, DISMISSAL AND NONSUIT, § 23 — tardy taking of nonsuit. In action, in municipal court of Chicago, against business brokers for amount claimed to be owing by them to plaintiff as result of transaction between parties, where written defense, filed by one of defendants, containing new affirmative matters, was admitted by plaintiff's failure to reply thereto, after court sustained motion of defendant, who filed defense, to effect that matters alleged by him were admitted, plaintiff was not entitled to take voluntary nonsuit and to dismissal of action without prejudice, but defendant, who alleged new matters, was entitled to judgment against plaintiff.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 25, 1948; released for publication March 25, 1948.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRAEGEL v. DAROS
(Feb 25, 1948)