Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Charles F. Castleman, Trading as Charles F. Castleman Timber Company, Appellant, v. W. C. Wright, Trading as Wright Construction Company, Appellee.

JUDGMENTS, § 5.1 — contradictory affidavits on motion for summary judgment. In action to recover balance due on account of materials alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant, motion for summary judgment was properly denied, where affidavits in support of motion set out several mutually contradictory statements of alleged facts, since purpose of summary judgment procedure is to ascertain whether issue exists to be determined by trier of facts.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE WHEAT.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 8, 1948; released for publication April 5, 1948.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASTLEMAN v. WRIGHT
(Mar 8, 1948)