Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAYES FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. MARTIN

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION — Proceedings to Secure Compensation — Special Answer — Findings of Fact. — Where a special answer that employee's injury was the result of a misdemeanor is filed, and evidence on the answer is introduced, it is the duty of the Industrial Board to make a finding on that issue as they must make a finding on all issues presented.

FLANAGAN, J.

Appellant appeals from an award of the Industrial Board granting compensation to appellee.

To appellee's application for compensation appellant filed a special answer asserting that the death of appellee's decedent was due to his commission of a misdemeanor. On this issue evidence was presented. However the board failed to make a finding thereon and of this omission appellant complains.

Our Supreme Court has held that it is the duty of the Industrial Board to make a finding of fact on every issue presented to it. Cole v. Sheehan Construction Company (1944), 222 Ind. 274, 53 N.E.2d 172. Language to the contrary appearing in the case of Czucko v. Golden-Gary Co., Inc. (1932), 94 Ind. App. 47, 177 N.E. 466, 179 N.E. 19, should be considered overruled.

Proceeding remanded to Industrial Board with instructions to make a finding of fact on the issue presented by appellant's special answer.

NOTE. — Reported in 77 N.E.2d 900.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAYES FREIGHT LINES v. MARTIN
(Mar 17, 1948)