AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROSE KARPEL, Plaintiff, v. ALFRED S. ROBERTS, Appellant. HAZEL A. FRANCISCO et al., Respondents,

Order modified on the law and the facts by striking therefrom the provisions transferring the action to Kings County and inserting in place thereof a provision directing the trial of the consolidated action to be had in Queens County. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Transferring the trial of the action to Kings County was an improvident exercise of discretion in view of the calendar conditions in the respective counties and the fact that the Queens County action was first begun. ( Funk v. Nelson, 264 App. Div. 876; Gibbs v. Sokol, 216 App. Div. 260; 3 Carmody on New York Pleading and Practice, § 859, p. 1638.) Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KARPEL v. ROBERTS
(Mar 1, 1948)