Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Lee Walker, Appellee, v. Weightstill Woods, Appellant.

JUDGMENTS, § 5.1 — validity of summary judgment. Where complaint in action for balance allegedly, due plaintiff on an account stated for expenditures in maintaining law office with defendant was filed within ten years after date of agreement signed by defendant and confirming previous oral agreement by which defendant had agreed to pay a certain sum to plaintiff, and copy of written agreement was attached to complaint, plaintiff's affidavit also attached thereto alleging that contents of complaint were true substantially complied with sec. 57 of Civil Practice Act and warranted summary judgment for plaintiff upon pleadings, with interest at five per cent from date of written agreement, in absence of denial that such agreement was executed and delivered (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 74, par. 2; ch. 83, par. 16; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 67.02, 107.275).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE FRIEND.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 4, 1948; released for publication June 4, 1948.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALKER v. WOODS
(May 4, 1948)