Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALEX BODNAR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. FLORENCE PIPE FOUNDRY AND MACHINECOMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We are asked to reverse the judgment under appeal on the ground that there was no competent evidence to support the finding of fact in the Supreme Court. Our examination of the record convinces us that there is such evidence. It is the settled rule that where there is evidence to support a finding of fact of the Supreme Court, this court is bound thereby.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BODNAR v. FLORENCE PIPE FOUNDRY, c., CO
(May 13, 1948)