Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Hinsdale Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. Martin Root, Nathan Root and Herman Root, Trading as Root Brothers Supply Company, Appellants.

JUDGMENTS, § 150 — propriety of denying motion to vacate ex parte judgment. Evidence that defendants' former attorney left defendants' employment without notifying defendant of his abandonment of their defense to plaintiff's action and that defendants "thought plaintiff had dropped the suit" warranted denial of defendants' motion to vacate ex parte judgment after 30 days on grounds that defendants were "negligent" in not obtaining another attorney after former one left their employ and were imprudent in assuming that plaintiff had dropped action (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, ch. 110, par. 196; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.072).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE KILEY.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 23, 1948; released for publication July 12, 1948.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HINSDALE MANUFACTURNING CO. v. ROOT
(Jun 23, 1948)