Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant and Respondent, v. CHARLES H. MULLENS and WILLIAM SOLOMON, Respondents and Appellants.

ORDER of Appellate Division, insofar as it reverses that part of the order of the Court of General Sessions dismissing counts one and four of the indictment and denies defendants' motion to dismiss said counts, reversed, and the order of the Court of General Sessions affirmed, and except as so modified order of Appellate Division affirmed. We do not find in the grand jury minutes independent, nonaccomplice evidence sufficient in law (Code Crim. Pro., § 399) to corroborate the testimony given by the accomplice Walsey concerning the so-called 1935 transaction, and legally adequate to support counts 1 and 4. ( People v. Mullens and Solomon, 292 N.Y. 408, 414-417; People v. Nitzberg, 289 N.Y. 523, 526, 530-531). No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: CONWAY and FULD, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MULLENS, SOLOMON
(Jul 16, 1948)