Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANNA IMPERATRICE, Respondent, v. ANTONIO IMPERATRICE et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Per Curiam.

Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants' motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N.Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action, nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.

The order should be affirmed, with costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur; CONWAY, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IMPERATRICE v. IMPERATRICE
(Jul 16, 1948)