Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NADA TRUSCOTT WELLBORN, Appellant, v. CHARLES WELLBORN, Respondent.

CARTER, J.

[1] This is an appeal from an order quashing the partial satisfaction of judgment of July 18, 1940, and reinstating the judgment lien made on motion in the above entitled action after the findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed in Sullivan v. Wellborn, ante, p. 214 [ 195 P.2d 787] this day decided. Mention is there made of such motion and order. Inasmuch as we have determined in Sullivan v. Wellborn, supra, ante, p. 214, that such partial satisfaction is to be expunged because it was the result of a void execution sale, the issue on this appeal becomes moot. (See Smith v. Bear Valley etc. Co., 26 Cal.2d 590 [ 160 P.2d 1]; Guardianship of Riley, 72 Cal.App.2d 742 [ 165 P.2d 555]; Crocker v. Crocker First Nat. Bank, 60 Cal.App.2d 725 [ 141 P.2d 482]; Crouser v. Boice, 51 Cal.App.2d 198 [ 124 P.2d 358]; Scoville v. De Bretteville, 50 Cal.App.2d 633 [ 123 P.2d 622].) The appeal should be, and therefore is, dismissed.

Gibson, C.J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WELLBORN v. WELLBORN
(Jul 13, 1948)