Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Samuel Levin argued the cause for the defendant-appellant ( Mr. Jack L. Holstein, attorney). Mr. Robert D. Grosman argued the cause and with Mr. Charles M. Grosman filed a brief for the petitioner-respondent.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Samuel Levin argued the cause for the defendant-appellant ( Mr. Jack L. Holstein, attorney). Mr. Robert D. Grosman argued the cause and with Mr. Charles M. Grosman filed a brief for the petitioner-respondent.
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

JOSEPH COFONE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CARMELA COFONE,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the result. The evidence supports the finding that there was a wilful and continued desertion of the respondent by the appellant, and the decree therefore is affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

COFONE v. COFONE
(Nov 1, 1948)