Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BOMAR v. KEYES et al.

PER CURIAM.

In Bomar v. Keyes we decided that the complaint should be dismissed against the City, and the plaintiff thereafter applied for certiorari which was denied on November 18, 1947. On December 17, 1947, Judge Rifkind entered an order dismissing the complaint against the City in conformity with our opinion, although meanwhile, the plaintiff had petitioned for rehearing, and that petition was not denied until December 22, 1947. This is an appeal from Judge Rifkind's order of December 17, 1947, entered upon our mandate.

2 Cir., 162 F.2d 136.

332 U.S. 825, 68 S.Ct. 166.

332 U.S. 845, 68 S.Ct. 266.

The order, even if it were wrong (which we do not even remotely suggest) is not appealable. Hohorst v. Hamburg Co.; National Bank of Rondout v. Smith; Bush v. Leach; Shultz v. Manufacturers Traders Trust Co. The appeal must be dismissed.

148 U.S. 262, 13 S.Ct. 590, 37 L.Ed. 443.

156 U.S. 330, 15 S.Ct. 358, 39 L.Ed. 441.

2 Cir., 22 F.2d 296.

2 Cir., 103 F.2d 771.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOMAR v. KEYES
(Oct 8, 1948)