1. APPEAL — Briefs — Assignment of Errors — Specification of Errors Not Sufficient. — An appellant's brief presents no question for review, where the brief under the heading "Errors relied upon for reversal" did not set forth any errors except such as would be grounds for a new trial, but there was nothing in the brief to inform the court whether there was a motion for a new trial or whether appellant intended to assign such errors independently. p. 462.
2. APPEAL — Briefs — Concise Statement of Record Omitted — No Question Presented for Review. — Where no attempt was made by appellant to set forth in his brief a "concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and exception relied upon," as required by Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court, appellant's brief presents no question for review. p. 462.
3. APPEAL — Briefs — Proposition and Points Not Supported by Authority — No Question Presented for Review. — Where the propositions and points set forth in appellant's brief are not supported by authority, as required by Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court, no question is presented by such brief for review. p. 462.
FLANAGAN, J.
Appellant's brief presents no question for review for the following reasons:
1. Under the heading "Errors relied upon for reversal," no errors are set forth except such as would be grounds for a new trial, but there is nothing in the brief to inform the 1. court whether there was a motion for a new trial or whether appellant is attempting to assign these errors independently.
2. There is no attempt to set forth a "concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and 2. exception relied upon," as required by Rule 2-17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court.
3. None of appellant's propositions or points are 3. supported by authority as required by the above rule.
Judgment affirmed.
NOTE. — Reported in 81 N.E.2d 378.