Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BORDEN v. INDUSTRIAL FINANCE COMPANY, INC.

APPEAL AND ERROR. — An appellate court will adhere to a ruling in an earlier case which has become a rule of property, and appellants' tax title must be held invalid.

ED F. McFADDIN, Justice.

The validity of appellants' tax title is the issue. With becoming candor counsel for appellants say: "There is but one vital issue presented by this appeal. At the outset we agree that if Lumsden v. Erstine, 205 Ark. 1004, 172 S.W.2d 409, 147 A.L.R. 1132, is yet the law in this State, then this case must be affirmed."

It is true that Lumsden v. Erstine was decided by a divided Court, but the case has been subsequently cited with approval in opinions to which there were no recorded dissents. Lumsden v. Erstine has become a rule of property, and we continue to adhere to the holding of that case.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BORDEN v. INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CO., INC
(Nov 1, 1948)